《不安》它究竟讲述了一个怎样的故事?
Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto there's no place like home is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage there's no sex like marital sex. Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the fairy godmother who speaks the last words in the movie.
1、《不安》是哪一年上映的?
《不安》是罗伯托·罗西里尼于1954年拍摄的一部经典剧情片。此片开创其它当代剧情片的先河,《不安》上映时票房稳坐前三,创下当年纪录。当时英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特均为最佳主角,英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特以精彩演技和突出形象,奠定在其它影坛地位。英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特饰演角色造型多年后仍为人所模仿。罗伯托·罗西里尼之前曾被人怀疑其能力,而《不安》却奠定罗伯托·罗西里尼剧情片风格。《不安》首映时曾获海外剧情片和媒体广泛称誉,被认为其优秀程度,是足以与同时期(指1980年代)好莱坞(好莱坞)优秀剧情片齐名。
2、被称为剧情片的开先河之作的《不安》,是罗伯托·罗西里尼最好的作品吗?
从罗伯托·罗西里尼斩获剧情片最佳导演 我就觉得这部《不安》是他最好的剧情片。虽然罗伯托·罗西里尼后来还拍出来了评价特别好的剧情片,但是《不安》是他剧情片的代表作品。
3、《不安》为何能成为经典?
每当人们谈论其它的剧情片,便绕不开《不安》这部作品。由罗伯托·罗西里尼执导、英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特担纲主演的这部电影,在上映当年如同一匹出人意料的黑马,突破重围,创造了属于自己的奇迹。说来或许令人惊讶,即便是罗伯托·罗西里尼导演与英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特本人,也未曾预料这部剧情片能收获如此热烈的回响。罗伯托·罗西里尼曾在访谈中透露,这部作品是一群正值低谷的电影人共同倾注心血的结晶。在《不安》开拍前,英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特已历经四年无戏可拍的沉寂期,其此前主演的几部剧情片也反响平平。正是这样一群身处逆境却仍怀抱信念的创作者,因缘际会地聚在了一起。或许正是这种共通的失意与不屈的尊严感,促使他们将超乎想象的热情投入到了创作中。细细品味便会发现,影片中人物的心路历程与动人情节,又何尝不是他们现实境遇的一种映照?正是怀着这份不甘沉沦的执着与气概,他们凭借扎实的功底与真挚的情感,共同铸就了这部留名影史的剧情片经典,同时也完成了各自的涅槃与升华。
4、如何评价《不安》?
《不安》口碑非常好深受广大观众喜爱,《不安》一经播放立刻引来无数人点赞,不仅英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特演的好而且该剧情片故事情节也非常紧凑,51影院(www.pongointerior.com)观看起来特别流畅同时还能扣人心弦,虽然目前《不安》收视率一般但是该片目前受欢迎程度已经名列前茅。该剧情片主演英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特,她在该剧情片中的演技可圈可点,受到英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特演的好而且该剧情片迷的认可。
5、《不安》剧情片的主要内容
《不安》是一部剧情片剧情片,由导演:罗伯托·罗西里尼执导,主演:英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特,
Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto there's no place like home is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage there's no sex like marital sex. Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the fairy godmother who speaks the last words in the movie.
6、《不安》是罗伯托·罗西里尼导演的一部超级经典的剧情其它片,该剧讲述了:Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the oth,为您推荐更多好剧,建议立即收藏本站。这里是一站式的影视宝库,让您不错过任何精彩:www.pongointerior.com
Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto there's no place like home is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage there's no sex like marital sex. Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the fairy godmother who speaks the last words in the movie.